Two authentic 5-minute roleplays on Zoom with calibrated pushback. I transcribe the call, audit your transcript against the official rubric, and email your Diagnostic Report within 48 hours.
You opened your results expecting a clean 380. Instead, you see a 320 or 330. Grade C+.
You speak fluent English every day. You manage hospital wards, review complex investigations, and make clinical decisions under pressure. So why did you fail a test designed for overseas clinicians?
The OET results slip gives you a single letter. No examiner notes. No criteria breakdown. When you consult generic tutors, they offer polite encouragement: "You sounded very polite, doctor. Just show more confidence next time." That subjective feedback is why competent doctors remain trapped in the 320 to 340 loop for months.
Failing by 10 or 20 points is rarely a failure of medical knowledge. It is an operational mismatch with the rubric. Every resit costs another £330+ examination fee and delays your GMC or AMC registration by several months, resulting in thousands of pounds in lost clinical earnings.
Politeness alone will not pass this examination. You need a structured clinical communication framework.
In ward medicine, you would never treat a patient based on vague impressions. You review the pathology results and check the objective findings.
I apply that exact precision to your consultation. During our 20-minute Zoom station, we run authentic OET conditions. Afterwards, I audit your spoken transcript line by line against the official 9 rubric criteria, showing you exactly where you lost marks and how to correct your phrasing.
I specialise in the operational mechanics, professional phrasing, and timeline framework of the OET Medicine Speaking sub-test.
Rather than teaching basic grammar, I have systematically reverse-engineered the official linguistic descriptors and clinical communication criteria. I designed the Diagnostic Mock Audit to give doctors what the examination board withholds: clear, transparent analysis of their performance. My objective is straightforward: pinpoint your exact rubric leaks and provide the natural phrasing required to secure your registration.
Subjective Feedback Vague comments such as "Try to sound more natural" or "Speak with more empathy," leaving you unsure how to improve.
Passive Interlocutors Tutors who act politely throughout, never challenging your medical jargon or interrupting when you speak past the 2-minute mark.
Unstructured Sessions Casual conversations with no written breakdown, leaving you with no clear action plan for test day.
Transcript Telemetry Direct transcript excerpts pinpointing your exact phrasing leaks across all 9 official criteria.
Authentic Pushback Calibrated patient resistance across 2 roleplays, testing your ability to de-escalate and explain conditions in lay terms.
Written Diagnostic Report A thorough written assessment delivered within 48 hours, complete with estimated scores and verbatim lay-English corrections.
From the moment you enter the Zoom room to the delivery of your report, the entire assessment follows a calibrated clinical framework.
Conducted under exam conditions. ID verification, warm-up questions, and two full 5-minute roleplays (Station 1: Outpatient, Station 2: Acute Presentation) with 3 minutes of silent preparation for each card.
I decouple feedback from the live call. Your recording is transcribed with speaker separation and timestamp tracking to examine pacing, phrasing, and response structure.
Your consultation is audited against all 4 Linguistic Criteria (Intelligibility, Fluency, Appropriateness of Language, Grammar) and all 5 Clinical Communication criteria (A, B, C, D, E).
Delivered to your email within 48 hours. Includes your projected scaled score (such as 325 Grade C+), exact transcript excerpts, and verbatim lay-English rewrites.
I do not evaluate on subjective impressions. Your report grades your consultations against the exact descriptors used by official examiners:
You receive a detailed written assessment engineered to give you complete operational clarity before test day.
A numerical breakdown across all 9 criteria, estimating your scaled score (such as 325 out of 500) and pinpointing your distance from the 350 GMC threshold.
Direct quotations from your transcript highlighting where you dropped marks, paired with side-by-side Senior Clinician phrasing corrections.
A concise action checklist summarising the exact lay translations, signposting techniques, and timeline checkpoints to execute during your real exam.
Choose the level of clinical communication feedback you require.
Ideal if your official examination is in the next 14 to 30 days.
Recommended if you have previously scored 320 to 340 in OET Speaking.
Immediate verbal impressions are often rushed and lead to unstructured debate. In the real exam, the interlocutor never critiques your performance. By concluding the call cleanly after our simulation, I review your full transcript and timeline markers thoroughly. You receive a structured, written Diagnostic Report with timestamped evidence, which is far more practical and reliable than hasty verbal notes.
I work exclusively with practicing medical doctors and appreciate that hospital rotas can change unexpectedly. If you are called into an emergency shift or urgent surgery, simply use the reschedule link inside your booking confirmation email at least 12 hours before our session to select a new calendar slot without penalty.
Your full written Diagnostic Report is delivered directly to your email inbox within 48 hours of our live Zoom station.
Yes. The Speaking sub-test follows the identical format whether you sit the exam on computer or paper. The 9 assessment criteria, the 5-minute consultation ceiling, and the interlocutor guidelines are identical across both test formats.
I use calibrated OET Medicine scenarios designed to evaluate specific clinical communication skills. Station 1 is typically an outpatient scenario to assess history taking and treatment planning. Station 2 involves an acute or distressed presentation to assess your de-escalation technique and lay-language clarity under pressure.
A diagnostic score of 325 is not a reflection of your clinical competence: it is simply an objective indicator of specific rubric leaks. Most doctors find it reassuring because they can finally see the exact two or three speech habits that caused mark deductions. Once those habits are identified, correcting them before your exam is entirely achievable.
I do not provide vague, feel-good tutoring. If your written Diagnostic Report does not clearly identify your specific transcript leaks across the official OET criteria, or if you feel the simulation did not reflect authentic exam conditions, email me within 24 hours of report delivery and I will make it right.